Maine Prom & Gradution Season 2013

by admin on May 2, 2013

It is that time of year again.  It has taken forever, but it is spring!  Hopefully summer will be here before the Fourth of July.  And with that comes more young people out and about, particularly those that are attending prom and graduation ceremonies.  If you are under the age of 21, PLEASE remember that involving drugs and/or alcohol in your celebration not only doubles the danger but it doubles the consequences too.

In Maine, the “Zero Tolerance” law as outlined in 29-A M.R.S. § 2472 applies to individuals who have yet to attain the age of 21, and includes the condition that the person not operate a motor vehicle with an alcohol level of more that 0.00 grams per 100 milliliters of blood or 210 liters of breath on the Intoxilyzer or blood test. In addition to being prosecuted for Operating Under the Influence (OUI), the Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) will suspend your license administratively for 1 year and an additional 180 days if you have a passenger in the vehicle who is also under the age of 21.

An individual under the age of 21 who violates the Implied Consent law by refusing to take a breath test (refusal) faces an administrative suspension of 18 months consecutive to (stacked on top of) any court-ordered suspension and 30 months for a second or subsequent refusal.  29-A M.R.S. § 2472(4).

Even if the young person has a test result that is below .08 BAC and avoids the criminal   charge of OUI, they will still be charged with “Operating Without A License” for violating the license condition or restriction that they not consume any alcohol while operating a motor vehicle.  Operating Beyond Restriction or “Operating Without A License” is a Class E misdemeanor for which a fine of no more than $1,000, no more than 6 months in jail can be ordered by the court. Additionally there will be consequences with the BMV that will affect your license.  29-A M.R.S. § 1251 (1)(B).

Simply transporting alcohol is a problem for minors in Maine.  28-A M.R.S. § 2052.  Its only a civil violation with a maximum fine of $500, but the BMV will still suspend your right to operate a motor vehicle for 30 days on a first offense, 90 days on a second offense and 1 year for any subsequent offense.  28-A M.R.S. § 2053.  It should be noted, that a minor is permitted to transport liquor in a motor vehicle if it is in the scope of the minor’s employment or at the request of a minor’s parents, guardian, or custodian.  So if your dad asks you to drive home a six pack of Pabst Blue Ribbon, you are good!!

There are similar penalties for drugs, and always remember that federal student loans can be run completely off the tracks with a simple possession of marijuana.  Just say no!

In Closing, I want to remind everyone that roadblocks and police departments running “intensive OUI detection details” will all be in the queue for the Summer of 2013.  Be safe and do not drink and drive.  At a great summer!

If you have been accused by the police in Maine of OUI, “Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs”,  Habitual Offender (HO), Operating under Suspension (OAS), possession of a controlled drug or any alleged motor vehicle or criminal offense, feel free to call Attorney John Webb today at 207-283-6400 and arrange a free consultation to discuss your case or visit: www.nicholswebb.com or www.OUIhotline.com.

 

{ 0 comments }

A Bad Day of Driving Then Drinking

by admin on October 24, 2012

The author of one of the greatest home runs in baseball history, thirty-seven years ago Sunday, was arrested for DUI/OUI/DWI on Monday, October 24th. Hall of Fame catcher Carlton Fisk, a god to Red Sox fans like me after his homerun in Game 6 of the 1975 World Series, was arrested in New Lenox, Illinois, refused to take a breath test and had an open bottle of vodka in the truck which was located in a cornfield.

If you are sitting in your vehicle in the middle of a cornfield and are charged with DWI/OUI/DUI here in Maine, you need to consult with a lawyer to help defend your case. How will the DAs Office prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt? Operation of a motor vehicle is an element of the crime that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Was there actual operation? Did the driver admit to operation? In Maine, operation requires a person to either have power or attempt to put power to the wheels. 29-A M.R.S. § 2401(6); State v. Sullivan 146 ME 381 (1951). Is the vehicle in park, or was it in gear with the driver’s foot on the brake?

How will the government overcome the subsequent drinking issue? If there is an open bottle of liquor in the vehicle with the driver, how will they prove that any alcohol onboard the driver wasn’t consumed post-accident? Do they even know how long the driver was sitting in the cornfield?

These issues are just the beginning of a full analysis of any DUI/OUI/DWI case. If you have been accused by the police in Maine of OUI, “Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs”, possession of a controlled drug or any alleged motor vehicle or criminal offense, feel free to call Attorney John Webb today at 207-283-6400 and arrange a free consultation to discuss your case or visit: www.nicholswebb.com.

{ 0 comments }

A REASON TO STOP YOU: Maine’s “Move Over” Law

September 28, 2012

For a law enforcement officer to stop you, they must have a “reasonable articulable suspicion” that criminal activity is underway.  One issue that gives rise to being stopped is a little known requirement that motorists move over when they see emergency flashing lights on or adjacent to the highway. You’re driving on the highway and [...]

Read the full article →

BLOW AS YOU GO IN MAINE

August 21, 2012

Since July of 2004, more than 75,000 ignition interlock devices have been installed in vehicles. These were installed as a result of the Transportation Restoration Act, passed in 1998. Under Maine statute 29-A §2508 a person convicted of a second or subsequent OUI offense may petition for early license reinstatement if they agree to install [...]

Read the full article →

Matt Nichols – Maine OUI Lawyer

July 31, 2012

Trial. That word causes apprehension and outright fear for most folks. In Maine, about 97% of criminalcases are resolved without trials. That being said, when you chose an attorney to represent you in an OUI or any other criminal case, you must have confidence that your lawyer will be prepared to try your case and [...]

Read the full article →

John Webb Speaks at NCDD Summer Session

July 30, 2012

I am proud to report that this past weekend I was a Demonstration Speaker and Group Instruction Team member at the Summer Session of the National College of DUI Defense, July 26th to the 28th, hosted by Dean George Stein and held at Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Massachusetts. www.NCDD.com The National College of DUI [...]

Read the full article →

Fake IDs and Underage Alcohol Purchases

June 22, 2012

As summer officially begins, many young adults will find themselves home for the summer or preparing to leave for college for the first time. Of course, college is a place where freedom abounds and, often, this new-found freedom results in an urge to party. This naturally leads some kids to be tempted to purchase alcohol, [...]

Read the full article →

GPS Tracking Devices – SCOTUS Decision

January 30, 2012

The 4th Amendment has been resuscitated!!  Hopefully you recall back in September of 2010, I wrote about GPS tracking devices and a recent decision from the District of Columbia Circuit (“GPS Tracking Devices – A Warrant or Not A Warrant – That is Now the Question”).  Well, on Monday we got our answer; kind of…. [...]

Read the full article →

Bullcoming Part II: Implications

August 19, 2011

So what does the Supreme Court’s decision in Bullcoming v. New Mexico mean for the country at large? The answer is that no longer can scientific evidence be introduced into a case as if it were non-testimonial evidence. Testing and subsequent analysis of forensic evidence, far from being rote, requires a level of scientific expertise [...]

Read the full article →

Bullcoming v. New Mexico: Part I

July 15, 2011

The Supreme Court recently ruled in Bullcoming v. New Mexico in favor of the Petitioner. The details of this otherwise mundane DWI/DUI case are as follows: Bullcoming, when initially pulled over on the night of the bad incident (@badincident), refused to take a breath alcohol test. As a result, a blood alcohol test was ordered, [...]

Read the full article →